… or so this author claims. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry!
Pages
Categories
Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
3 Comments
MTV’s parent Viacom should buy this newspaper and place it under Simon & Schuster’s fiction unit after this outrageous claim. A mash-up b/t this reporter and a simple Google search makes for a new trend-setting movement, too. Accurate journalism…
It’s not just that claim, it’s the rest of the article – she seems to be suggesting that every “unlikely” collaboration in the history of the world was a “mash-up” (and of course, therefore invented by MTV!!!)
That author doesn’t quite understand that a mash-up isn’t an original piece of music (like Nelly and Tim Mcgraw on Over and Over or Loretta Lynn and Jack White) You think a reporter whould do their research huh?
Post a Comment